Your twin screens every CV against your role spec, runs structured pre-interviews in your recruiter's voice, and hands you a ranked shortlist with notes. Time-to-hire cut in half; bias reduced.
Each one cleared by your twin — within your hiring policy and bias controls.
Pain: Recruiter spends 30 seconds per CV, 4 hours per role just scanning — 96% of which will be rejects.
Fix: Twin scores every CV against your criteria (skills, seniority, domain, location) and surfaces only the top 20 — with reasoning, not just a score.
Pain: Every intro call: 'tell me about yourself', 'why this role', 'salary expectations', 'notice period'. Same 30-minute call × 40 candidates × 20 hours/month.
Fix: Twin runs the structured intro (async text or voice) in your recruiter's style — consistent, respectful, time-zone-free. Summary + ranking in your ATS.
Pain: Top candidates have 5 offers. You reply on day 3; by then they've moved on.
Fix: Twin replies within minutes, moves candidates through the funnel on their timeline, not yours.
Pain: Unconscious bias on name, school, gap years shapes the shortlist. Diversity suffers; legal exposure grows.
Fix: Twin screens on job-relevant criteria only, optionally blind-review mode. Audit trail shows reasoning per decision.
Pain: Candidate + 3 interviewers + timezone = 6 emails to find a slot. Multiply by 40 candidates = a full week of coordination.
Fix: Twin has calendar access, suggests slots, books directly, handles reschedules. Humans don't negotiate calendars.
Pain: You reject 480 people per role; most get silent treatment. Bad Glassdoor reviews, closed doors on future hires.
Fix: Twin sends personalized rejection in your recruiter's voice, on your timeline, with useful feedback where appropriate.
Based on an in-house recruiter at $80/hr hiring 8 roles/quarter. Scales with role volume.
| Metric | Without twin | With DiGTwin | Your monthly saving* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiter hours/role on CV screening | 12 h | 1 h | −88 h/quarter · ≈ $7,040 |
| Recruiter hours/role on intro calls | 20 h | 3 h | −136 h/quarter · ≈ $10,880 |
| Time-to-shortlist | 14 days | 3 days | 4× faster |
| Candidate-response speed | 36 h | 10 min | +30% accept rate |
| Scheduling friction | 6 msgs/interview | 1 msg | coordination gone |
| Rejection response coverage | 20% | 100% | +employer brand |
| In-house recruiter quarterly uplift | ≈ $18,000+ | ||
*Assumes $80/hr recruiter rate, 8 roles/quarter. Agencies scale much higher per recruiter.
Past reports, briefs, Slack/email exports, Notion docs — RAG ingests instantly.
5-minute recording — the twin replies by voice and can appear on video if you want.
Two minutes to define tone, off-limits topics and escalation rules.
Correct any reply — the twin learns your judgment call for next time.
We follow job-relevant criteria only, log reasoning, offer human review mandate. Configurable for EU AI Act high-risk workflows. You control policy.
Greenhouse, Lever, Workable natively. Huntflow, Potok via API. Writes all stages, reasoning, transcripts back to the record.
Yes — disclosure is standard and legally required in many markets. Candidates often prefer it — faster, structured, less bias.
Soft-reject bucket routes borderline cases to a human. Confidence threshold tunable. Daily audit sampling on rejections.
Yes — role spec depth is configurable. For exec search, twin handles logistics + fit screening; decision stays human.
Free to try, ATS sync in a day, shortlist in first week.
Start freeOpen in English? EN version.