Your twin knows your repo and docs cold. Answers architecture questions, walks juniors through patterns, pre-reviews PRs against your style — so you can actually ship code again.
Each one absorbed by your twin — with your repo context.
Pain: Team slacks: 'which service handles auth?', 'where's the payment webhook?', 'what's our retry policy?' — same questions, different askers.
Fix: Twin indexes your entire codebase. Answers repo questions with file paths, line numbers and architecture context — in seconds.
Pain: Missing tests, wrong error handling, broken conventions, N+1 queries, no observability. You write the same review comments for months.
Fix: Twin pre-reviews the PR with your rubric — catches the common 80% before you even look. Your review focuses on actual design calls.
Pain: Codebase tour, architecture overview, conventions, tooling. Each hire costs you 40+ hours of walkthrough time.
Fix: Twin runs the onboarding: architecture walkthrough, conventions quiz, 'why we built it this way' answers — 24/7. You join for depth only.
Pain: Team asks 'why did we pick Kafka over RabbitMQ?' You remember, but nobody else does. Decisions get re-litigated monthly.
Fix: Twin captures ADRs, design docs, tech-spec Slack threads. Answers 'why' questions with the original reasoning and tradeoffs.
Pain: Deep in a refactor; ping every 15 minutes about something unrelated; you lose 30 min each time to reload state.
Fix: Twin buffers questions, answers 80% directly, batches the rest to a daily digest for you.
Pain: Senior engineer leaves. Half the 'why' evaporates with them. Team rediscovers pitfalls over the next 6 months.
Fix: Twin captures reasoning continuously. When someone leaves, their knowledge stays queryable — no institutional memory loss.
Based on a tech lead at $150/hr with a team of 8. Scales with team size.
| Metric | Without twin | With DiGTwin | Your monthly saving* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tech-lead hours/week on repo questions | 12 h | 2 h | −40 h/mo · ≈ $6,000 |
| Tech-lead hours/week on PR review | 10 h | 3 h | −28 h/mo · ≈ $4,200 |
| Onboarding time to first PR merged | 10 days | 3 days | 3× faster ramp |
| PRs that require re-review after first pass | 45% | 18% | +cycle time |
| Tech-lead actual coding hours/week | 8 h | 24 h | 3× IC output |
| Decisions with documented reasoning | 25% | 90% | no re-litigation |
| Tech-lead monthly uplift | ≈ $12,500+ | ||
*At $150/hr tech-lead rate. Team velocity gains are multiplicative.
Past reports, briefs, Slack/email exports, Notion docs — RAG ingests instantly.
5-minute recording — the twin replies by voice and can appear on video if you want.
Two minutes to define tone, off-limits topics and escalation rules.
Correct any reply — the twin learns your judgment call for next time.
RAG over your repo + embeddings over code structure + ingest of ADRs/design docs. Not a generic LLM — grounded in your specific code.
Code stays in your account, encrypted at rest. We don't train public models on it. On-prem deployment for regulated enterprises.
GitHub native (bot user for PR comments). GitLab native. Bitbucket via webhook. Self-hosted Git on request.
Yes — monorepo-aware, can scope queries per service or cross-service. Handles Bazel/Nx/Lerna layouts.
No. It scales senior leverage — it handles repetitive questions and first-pass review. Seniors focus on design, hard problems, mentoring.
Free plan, repo ingest in under an hour, team uses the twin from day one.
Start freeOpen in English? EN version.